Safety Security & Sustainability

   EU shipping safety & security
D. Jarvis - CETLE

In order to facilitate more effective support for safety and security it is envisaged that coastal States will require strengthening their capabilities for the following key elements:

a.     The ability to provide pro-active vessel traffic management to ships not only in their Territorial Sea but beyond and through into the boundaries of their Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ);

b.     A structured and harmonized co-operation between the Member States and exchange of information between Member States and the involvement of a more effective SafeSeaNet (SSN), also with respect to incidents and accidents;

c.     The approach to cover all public interests with respect to maritime traffic and transport.


To this end it is required to consider, through innovative use of resources and technologies, the ability for shore-based operators to be able to monitor and provide the appropriate level of assistance wherever the ship may be located in the coastal waters, shifting the emphasis from remedial services towards proactive services.


Safety and security capabilities need to address the development of efficient ways for mandatory reporting. Adopting the concept of national Single Windows for all member States will not only impact the manner in which data is reported to the authorities but also the way in which this data is distributed and made available to the various authorities, these being not only the “traditional” maritime authorities but also authorities such as customs, immigration and health.


Concepts such as Maritime Operational Services and Maritime Information Management rely to a great extent on the cooperation of various authorities, not only maritime, all with a vested interest in improving maritime safety, security, efficiency and protection of the environment.

Previous research and initiatives focussing on (and depending on) pan-European cooperation and harmonisation between maritime (and other) authorities of the member States have often been confronted with the (perceived) differences in organisational structures and allocation of responsibilities.

To this end this study provides examples of what appears on the outside as variance between member States however on closer examination similar through the conduct of the same or similar roles, tasks and responsibilities. based the architecture, as developed in the ARKTRANS project and implemented for both the FREIGHTWISE and MarNIS projects, this study demonstrates an approach which could lead to minimum disruption for existing organisational models and demonstrate synergies between the maritime traffic and transport sectors.

View / Add Comments


   Glossary Terms


No glossary terms available


  Additional Information for EU shipping safety & security
  No related journals  
  No related events  
  No related experts  
   Subject News
  18/05/2016 - Baltic maritime security
11/04/2016 - Owners should ensure HF equipment is updated for GMDSS
12/02/2016 - Marine Industry addresses RO-RO safety
05/02/2016 - Breaking down the barriers to improved surveillance
28/01/2016 - MSC Flaminia Fire Helps EU Develop Guidelines on Places of Refuge
27/01/2016 - Georgia joins SafeSeaNet
Click here to view all related news
   Linked Topics
  Review of ‘monitoring’ Directive 2002/59/EC

Regulatory Framework
   Related Documents
  No documents available  
   Lessons Learned
  No data available  
   Information Sources
  AAPA Seaports Magazine
American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA)
ECSA European Community Shipowners' Associations
Maritime and Coastguard Agency
Maritime Accident case book
Click here to view all related Sources
   Related Projects
   Related Policies
  No related policies  
   Related Products
  No Product Services available  
Copyright 2009, SkemaKnowledge Developed by eBOS Technologies Ltd